Accuracy requirements to test the applicability of the random cascade model to supersonic turbulence

A model, which is widely used for inertial rang statistics of supersonic turbulence in the context of molecular clouds and star formation, expresses (measurable) relative scaling exponents Z_p of two-point velocity statistics as a function of two parameters, beta and Delta. The model relates them to the dimension D of the most dissipative structures, D=3-Delta/(1-beta). While this description has proved most successful for incompressible turbulence (beta=Delta=2/3, and D=1), its applicability in the highly compressible regime remains debated. For this regime, theoretical arguments suggest D=2 and Delta=2/3, or Delta=1. Best estimates based on 3D periodic box simulations of supersonic isothermal turbulence yield Delta=0.71 and D=1.9, with uncertainty ranges of Delta in [0.67, 0.78] and D in [2.04,1.60]. With these 5-10\% uncertainty ranges just marginally including the theoretical values of Delta=2/3 and D=2, doubts remain whether the model indeed applies and, if it applies, for what values of beta and Delta. We use a Monte Carlo approach to mimic actual simulation data and examine what factors are most relevant for the fit quality. We estimate that 0.1% (0.05%) accurate Z_p, with p=1...5, should allow for 2% (1%) accurate estimates of beta and Delta in the highly compressible regime, but not in the mildly compressible regime. We argue that simulation-based Z_p with such accuracy are within reach of today's computer resources. If this kind of data does not allow for the expected high quality fit of beta and Delta, then this may indicate the inapplicability of the model for the simulation data. In fact, other models than the one we examine here have been suggested.Comment: 8 pages, 8 figures, accepted by Astronomy and Astrophysic

Comparison of different nonlinear solvers for 2D time-implicit stellar hydrodynamics

Time-implicit schemes are attractive since they allow numerical time steps that are much larger than those permitted by the Courant-Friedrich-Lewy criterion characterizing time-explicit methods. This advantage comes, however, with a cost: the solution of a system of nonlinear equations is required at each time step. In this work, the nonlinear system results from the discretization of the hydrodynamical equations with the Crank-Nicholson scheme. We compare the cost of different methods, based on Newton-Raphson iterations, to solve this nonlinear system, and benchmark their performances against time-explicit schemes. Since our general scientific objective is to model stellar interiors, we use as test cases two realistic models for the convective envelope of a red giant and a young Sun. Focusing on 2D simulations, we show that the best performances are obtained with the quasi-Newton method proposed by Broyden. Another important concern is the accuracy of implicit calculations. Based on the study of an idealized problem, namely the advection of a single vortex by a uniform flow, we show that there are two aspects: i) the nonlinear solver has to be accurate enough to resolve the truncation error of the numerical discretization, and ii) the time step has be small enough to resolve the advection of eddies. We show that with these two conditions fulfilled, our implicit methods exhibit similar accuracy to time-explicit schemes, which have lower values for the time step and higher computational costs. Finally, we discuss in the conclusion the applicability of these methods to fully implicit 3D calculations.Comment: Accepted for publication in A&

Supersonic turbulence in 3D isothermal flow collision

Colliding supersonic bulk flows shape observable properties and internal physics of various astrophysical objects, like O-star winds, molecular clouds, galactic sheets, binaries, or gamma-ray bursts. Using numerical simulations, we show that the bulk flows leave a clear imprint on the collision zone, its mean properties and the turbulence it naturally develops. Our model setup consists of 3D head-on colliding isothermal hydrodynamical flows with Mach numbers between 2 and 43. Simulation results are in line with expectations from self-similarity: root mean square Mach numbers (Mrms) scale linearly with upstream Mach numbers, mean densities remain limited to a few times the upstream density. The density PDF is not log-normal. The turbulence is inhomogeneous: weaker in the zone center than close to the confining shocks. It is anisotropic: while Mrms is generally supersonic, Mrms transverse to the upstream flow is always subsonic. We argue that uniform, isothermal, head-on colliding flows generally disfavor isotropic, supersonic turbulence. The anisotropy carries over to other quantities like the density variance - Mach number relation. Structure functions differ depending on whether they are computed along a line-of-sight perpendicular or parallel to the upstream flow. We suggest that such line-of-sight effects should be kept in mind when interpreting turbulence characteristics derived from observations.Comment: 20 pages, 14 figures, 4 tables, accepted by Astronomy and Astrophysic

The energetics of relativistic magnetic reconnection: ion-electron repartition and particle distribution hardness

Collisionless magnetic reconnection is a prime candidate to account for flare-like or steady emission, outflow launching, or plasma heating, in a variety of high-energy astrophysical objects, including ones with relativistic ion-electron plasmas. But the fate of the initial magnetic energy in a reconnection event remains poorly known: what is the amount given to kinetic energy, the ion/electron repartition, and the hardness of the particle distributions? We explore these questions with 2D particle-in-cell simulations of ion-electron plasmas. We find that 45 to 75% of the total initial magnetic energy ends up in kinetic energy, this fraction increasing with the inflow magnetization. Depending on the guide field strength, ions get from 30 to 60% of the total kinetic energy. Particles can be separated into two populations that only weakly mix: (i) particles initially in the current sheet, heated by its initial tearing and subsequent contraction of the islands; and (ii) particles from the background plasma that primarily gain energy via the reconnection electric field when passing near the X-point. Particles (ii) tend to form a power-law with an index $p=-d\log n(\gamma)/d\log\gamma$, that depends mostly on the inflow Alfv\'en speed $V_A$ and magnetization $\sigma_s$ of species $s$, with for electrons $p=5$ to $1.2$ for increasing $\sigma_e$. The highest particle Lorentz factor, for ions or electrons, increases roughly linearly with time for all the relativistic simulations. This is faster, and the spectra can be harder, than for collisionless shock acceleration. We discuss applications to microquasar and AGN coronae, to extragalactic jets, and to radio lobes. We point out situations where effects such as Compton drag or pair creation are important.Comment: 15 pages, submitted to A&

Relativistic magnetic reconnection in collisionless ion-electron plasmas explored with particle-in-cell simulations

Magnetic reconnection is a leading mechanism for magnetic energy conversion and high-energy non-thermal particle production in a variety of high-energy astrophysical objects, including ones with relativistic ion-electron plasmas (e.g., microquasars or AGNs) - a regime where first principle studies are scarce. We present 2D particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations of low $\beta$ ion-electron plasmas under relativistic conditions, i.e., with inflow magnetic energy exceeding the plasma rest-mass energy. We identify outstanding properties: (i) For relativistic inflow magnetizations (here $10 < \sigma_e < 360$), the reconnection outflows are dominated by thermal agitation instead of bulk kinetic energy. (ii) At large inflow electron magnetization ($\sigma_e > 80$), the reconnection electric field is sustained more by bulk inertia than by thermal inertia. It challenges the thermal-inertia-paradigm and its implications. (iii) The inflows feature sharp transitions at the entrance of the diffusion zones. These are not shocks but results from particle ballistic motions, all bouncing at the same location, provided that the thermal velocity in the inflow is far smaller than the inflow E cross B bulk velocity. (iv) Island centers are magnetically isolated from the rest of the flow, and can present a density depletion at their center. (v) The reconnection rates are slightly larger than in non-relativistic studies. They are best normalized by the inflow relativistic Alfv\'en speed projected in the outflow direction, which then leads to rates in a close range (0.14-0.25) thus allowing for an easy estimation of the reconnection electric field.Comment: Submitted to A&